If a man spent his entire pay check on beer, there would still be beer for sale.
If he sold everything he had and spent it on beer, there would still be beer for sale.
If Bill Gates sold everything he had and spent it on beer, there would still be beer for sale.
If all of the richest people sold everything and spent it on beer, there would still be beer for sale.
No matter how much is spent on beer, there would STILL be beer for sale.
Why?

Do you not now need a strong government to get to a small government. It seems like a catch 22 to me. Do we have to wait for a black swan?

In the United States, the population is rising, this means that without the printing of more money, there will be the same amount of money for a greater amount of people, meaning it will make each dollar more valuable. Yet we print money that really on has a value because we give it one (it is simply paper after all). Printing off more money also leads the the devaluation of it as well (the wheelbarrow story in Germany). How is it that we stay this from happening?

I have read that we will continue to lose jobs as the impact of technology broadens. Yet meaningful work is the way many of us define our lives.

SHARK TANK U - an outline of the steps it takes to go from IDEA TO
WE'RE KING OF THE HILL , HERE'S HOW WE DID IT , SO PAY
ATTENTION !

have you considered using EVERYDAY PEOPLE to make your points in EVERYDAY ECONOMICS , for example , a great many
man (woman) in the street LESSONS ?

All other developed nations have universal health care, paid for through a variety of methods. I understand the accident of history that caused the healthcare system to become essentially a bargaining chip for the unions, but now we have so fewer unions. So why do Americans put up with such a dysfunctional system, now rapid moving towards "cost sharing" which will only serve to bankrupt more and more individuals?

knowing the economical reasons that makes a country attacks another country

Why does a common currency work in the United States but not in the European Union? I've heard that the difference between the strengths of the German and Greek economies (for instance) make the euro union fail, but don't US states also differ in the strength of their economies--why don't we see the same destructive effects of a common currency?

Would like to hear more about how economics can advise on solutions to international environmental commons problems.

Should the United States change their system of debt? What would happen without a central bank?

But put in a bit more work than this:
http://cafehayek.com/2011/04/land.html

Would we all enjoy relatively more or less prosperity if labor (workers) were allowed to move freely across international borders just like capital does?

I've been reading a lot of news about copyright and patent laws with respect to technology. In what ways has intellectual property laws affected the economy and what are the possible pros and cons of proposed changes?

Since you've started by talking about trade and the division of labor, a discussion of knowledge's effects on labor productivity would be relevant. For example, why does LeBron James play basketball better if there are other good players on his team? (Example stolen from Bill Easterly's explanation of complementarity and skill matching in Elusive Quest for Growth.)

I think it is a good idea to remind people to look beyond the impact of those immediately affected by a specific government policy. It is easy to see employment in an industry that is protected by tariffs. However, it is not easy to see how that impacts job creation in other industries, government revenues, wages, productivity, and standards of living (for instance).

Should the United states as a rule push for more closed borders where people cant come in to find work? Or, are we better off with an open system where by people can enter the country and find a job.

This is a timely subject, in need of economic education.